Rate Your Team\'s Agile Practices
Score each dimension from 1 (ad-hoc) to 5 (optimized). Be honest — this is about finding growth areas, not getting a high score.
Do you run consistent sprints? Is planning structured? Are commitments realistic?
Defined (3/5)Are roles clear (PO, SM, devs)? Does the team self-organize? Is collaboration genuine or performative?
Defined (3/5)Do you ship working software every sprint? Is there CI/CD? Are bugs caught early?
Defined (3/5)Are retros actionable? Do you measure velocity? Does the team experiment and adapt?
Defined (3/5)Does leadership support Agile? Is failure safe? Is the team empowered to make decisions?
Defined (3/5)Your Improvement Roadmap
About This Assessment
This assessment measures Agile maturity across 5 dimensions based on the Agile Fluency Model and the Scrum Maturity Assessment framework. The maturity levels are:
- 1 — Ad-hoc: No consistent practice. Work happens but without Agile structure.
- 2 — Emerging: Practices are tried but inconsistent. Some ceremonies happen, some don\'t.
- 3 — Defined: Consistent Agile practices. Ceremonies are regular, roles are clear.
- 4 — Managed: Data-driven Agile. Metrics guide decisions. Continuous improvement is systematic.
- 5 — Optimized: Agile is part of the culture, not just the process. Innovation and experimentation are encouraged.
Most teams land at 2-3 on their first assessment. Reaching 4+ typically takes 12-18 months of deliberate improvement. A score of 5 across all dimensions is extremely rare and not necessarily the goal — the right maturity level depends on your context.